Home
Newsroom
Legislative Issues
About MAPPS

State Chapters

MAPPS PAC
Membership Information
Member Firm Profiles
Careers in Geospatial
Flightline
MAPPS Library
Contact MAPPS
 
Outsourcing News
 
Legal Opinion on Offshore Outsourcing

One of the most controversial issues facing the private geospatial community is the practice of sending work to offshore subcontractors. The MAPPS Board has spent a considerable amount of time debating this issue and considering what position MAPPS should take on legislation and public policies related to offshoring.

MAPPS, as a trade association, cannot and does not tell its members how to do business. The association, can, however, (1) advocate certain legislation and government policy; and (2) keep its members informed of current law and regulations to assist its members in determining their compliance with such laws and regulations.

It is in that later matter that the Board decided to engage a prominent Washington, DC law firm to analyze current Federal law and regulation. The firm of Crowell & Moring was asked, "If a U.S. firm wins a Federal contract and then, without the government's knowledge, sends the work to an offshore subcontractor, would that U.S. firm be in violation of any current law or regulation?"

The opinion of Crowell & Moring is that such a scenario indeed violates several laws, including the Brooks Act for A/E services, the False Claims Act, the Truth in Negotiation Act and the Service Contract Act.

While we can have a healthy debate over whether Congress should enact additional laws regarding offshoring of services, the MAPPS Board believes it is important that current law is properly enforced. We are distributing this letter to you, our members, so you know your responsibilities and stay fully in compliance with the law. As outlined in this letter, the penalties for violating the law are severe.

We hope you find this helpful. To view the full opinion, click here
 
The History of Outsourcing & A-76
 
PowerPoint Presentation by John Palatiello on Outsourcing, A-76 & Competitive Sourcing
available soon

 
 House Votes to Reject New A-76 Rules
 
The U.S. House of Representatives voted on Tuesday evening, September 9, to block implementation of the Bush Administration’s new competitive sourcing rules, the Revised A-76. The House action came on a 220 to 198 vote on an amendment by Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD). The Van Hollen amendment requires the Office of Management and Budget to use the “Circular A-76” rules that were in effect before the Revised A-76 process was implemented on May 29.

In the floor vote on the Van Hollen amendment, all but 3 Democrats were joined in the vote by 26 Republicans to impose the limits on the competitive sourcing program. Government employee unions who pushed for the Van Hollen amendment, also opposed the old A-76.

Earlier floor action: The House rejected another anti-competitive sourcing amendment by Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL).


Government Executive article on the floor action click here

See how your Congressional represenative voted click here

View MAPPS Comments on the A-76 Revision click here
Administration's Revised A-76 click here.